FEAT: Add dictionary entries to set custom savefields #5502
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…up custom save fields
|
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
jvela018
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5502 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.76% 84.69% +3.92%
==========================================
Files 143 143
Lines 60118 60120 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 48557 50917 +2360
+ Misses 11561 9203 -2358 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Added entries in the transient dictionary for maxwell under setup_templates.py, to account for custom field saves of different types. This should be seen as a temporary solution. Perhaps this will be worked out as part of PR #5496